“Another child poisoned by cordial” was the headline in the Yorkshire Post newspaper on 9th November 1875 and detailed the case of a poor 2 year old child called Harry Scholey, who died after being administered with 2 teaspoonful’s of something called anodyne cordial, which had been bought from a local Sheffield woman called Mary Ann Bancroft. The headline says "Another child" which suggests that this was not the first such incident.
The case had been heard the previous day by the Sheffield Coroner, at the Talbot Hotel in Duke Street Sheffield, close to where Mary Ann Bancroft lived, and detailed the incident as follows:
The child had not been feeling well, so the parents went for a pennyworth of anodyne cordial to Mrs Bancroft, who appears to be someone people turned to at times like this, due to the fact that many ordinary people just could not afford to pay for a visit from a doctor. The child, was given two teaspoonful’s of the cordial and was dead within six hours, the parents having had to call in a doctor when he became seriously ill within two hours of taking it. A post-mortem on the child showed he died of opium poisoning.
Witnesses stated that many local people bought the cordial from Mrs Bancroft, who made it up in her house and sold it in bottles without any labels or instructions regarding how it should be administered. She had a card in her window saying “Anodyne Cordial sold here” and said she had been selling it for about forty years. When questioned by the authorities she stated that she always gave instructions about how much to give to children according to their ages, and bought all the ingredients from the local druggist shop. The child’s parents did not know what the mixture contained, and were certain they were not told the amount to administer to their child
The inquest jury in giving their verdict said ‘The deceased died from being poisoned by an overdose of anodyne containing opium sold by Mrs Bancroft without directions as to its use, and carelessly administered by his father. They also said that the sale of anodyne indiscriminately by Mrs Bancroft is highly dangerous and ought to be stopped.’
The newspaper reported that the Coroner in his summing up said ‘There was not sufficient evidence to send Mrs Bancroft for trial, but if she should find herself in this position again, she would be dealt with by the law, and censured her severely. Mrs Bancroft agreed to cease selling the cordial immediately.’
Anodyne potions was bought by many people in the 19th century, as an alternative to paying to see the doctor if they had mild illnesses such as stomach ailments or neuralgia, and many companies produced a legitimate version of this mixture, in marked bottles with ingredients and dosage clearly displayed, as the following label shows,
Although opium was often used by druggists in various medicines at the time, I am sure no one would have recommended it be given to infants, When questioned, by the court, Mary Ann Bancroft listed the following ingredients in the ‘home remedy’ she was brewing up in her house.
2oz of corlander seed
2 oz of aniseed
2 oz of juniper seeds
1 oz of Spanish juice
18 grains of opium
½ lb of treacle
Boiled down with 3 pints of water.
It seems fairly clear from looking at the 1871 census, that Mary Ann was one of those women that the local community turned to in times of trouble, as she is listed on the census with a very unusual occupation…Undertakeress !! , which probably entailed preparing a corpse, ready for a proper undertaker to carry our the burial.
Early records, when she was living with her husband and family do not show her as having any occupation, which was common for many married women, but she also probably helped also acted as an unofficial midwife, and nurse if someone turned up at her door, having told the court that she had been selling anodyne for over 40 years.
She was born Mary Ann Pollard in the Sheffield area around 1802, and married Robert Bancroft, a coal miner, on 12th November 1821. Thereafter the family seemed to have lived most of their lives in Duke Street, Sheffield. Robert Bancroft died in 1868, and Mary Ann around 1880.
There are no further incidents reported of Mary Ann selling further ‘remedies’ so it looks as though she heeded the Coroner’s warning and ceased selling the potion.
|Nettle Hall Farm|
Whilst going through some old family photos left by my Grandmother, Hettie Bancroft, who together with my Grandfather John ran a mixed farm, known as " Nettle Hall" near Thornton in Bradford West Yorkshire I was struck by how much farming practices have changed since the 1920’s when most of these wonderful photos were taken.
Looking at haymaking in the 1920’s these pictures show how things have changed. Seen here are scenes of men and women gathering up all the loose hay with wooden rakes, before it was put on the cart to transport back to the barn for storage through the winter to feed livestock. The picture of all the family, with John on the top of the hay cart, plus helpers, and with the ever trusty cart-horse ready to pull it away, shows how things have changed. Today this work would be done by one man driving a tractor and bailing machine and another following on behind to scoop up the bails onto a trailer.
And another picture of them in the field racking up the loose hay, the men wearing their flat caps, even though it must have been fairly strenuous work on a hot summer's day.
Then a picture of my Great-Grandparents, Lister and Jane Watson, who lived on the next farm, having a little rest, no doubt before the hay-cart came back again for another load. A contented scene, Lister with pipe in mouth resting on a hay pile, Jane with a wooden rake in hand and a scarf on her head to protect her from the sun. Just visible are the steel toe-caps of his clogs.
Being a mixed farm, they also had quite a lot of pigs at one time, here is John out in the field with a few of them, in the days when pigs spent most of their life able to wander around outside unlike today when most are reared intensively in sheds.
And of course the children also had their own daily chores, one of which was feeding all the hens, and collecting any eggs. Here they are, with my father as a child in the striped hat, outside, gathering all the hens together.Again, like the pigs shown above, these hens were able to wonder around the farmyard, able to scratch around in the earth, unlike today's hens, who at best probably spend all their lives in sheds, or even worse in cages.
From the 1920’s to the late 1950’s most work on the farm was done using heavy horses, and my grandparents always had a couple of heavy horses for this. Shown here is Hettie standing proudly holding the last of their farm horses. I will remember her talking about then, and calling them fondly by name. [One was called ‘Darling’, can’t remember the name of the other]. However the fateful day came when they were no longer needed due to the arrival of a tractor on the farm, and as no one wanted them, the only solution was to take them to be put down at the local Knacker’s Yard. Hettie said she could not bear to see them being led away for slaughter, so stayed in the farmhouse, hoping that they would not make any noise when being loaded into the wagon. Unfortunately one of them whinnied as it was loaded up, and she says she burst into tears and cried for a week afterwards!
Is farming a better way of life today?....I wonder....here's my view in a poem.
|The 'Neptune' ship|
Here is a story which just goes to show how punishment has changed since the mid-19th century. It concerns a John Bancroft from Ovenden near Halifax in Yorkshire, who appeared in court at the York Assizes on 18th October 1845 charged with the theft of a lock and key from one person and two handkerchiefs from another and was sentenced in court to seven years transportation !
No further details were given about the offences, or about the defendant’s previous record of convictions, but even by standards at the time this must have seemed an unusually harsh sentence when compared with sentences given out the same day to people who were also guilty of various thefts and were given short prison sentences.
John Bancroft was born and brought up in the area known as Ovenden, the son of Thomas and Jane Bancroft and the 1841 census shows the family of Thomas and Jane living at Park Lane with their six children, John being 14 years old at the time. His father is listed as a Surveyor [shown as ‘Surveyor of roads’ on the later census]. Oddly none of the children as shown as working, which must have been an omission by the census enumerator.
This got me wondering about what a sentence of Transportation actual entailed, and how people coped with this dramatic change in their life. us thefts and were given short prison
Between 1788 and 1868, approximately 162,000 convicts were transported to the various Australian penal colonies by the British government. The British government began transporting criminals to overseas colonies in the 17th century, and when transportation to the American colonies declined with the move towards American independence in the 1770s, an alternative site was needed to avoid further overcrowding of British prisons and hulks[ floating prisons]. In 1770, James Cook charted and claimed possession of the east coast of Australia for Britain. Due to the continent's isolation, it was considered ideal for a penal colony, and in 1787 the First Fleet of eleven convict ships set sail for Botany Bay, arriving on 20 January 1788 to found Sydney, the first European settlement in Australia. Other penal colonies were later established in Van Diemen's Land [Tasmania], Queensland and Western Australia. Penal transportation to Australia peaked in the 1830s and dropped off significantly in the following decade. The last convict ship arrived in Western Australia on 10 January 1868.Many of the convicts were transported for petty crimes such as theft. More serious crimes, such as rape and murder, were not transportable offences. After their prison terms were served most stayed in Australia and joined the other settlers, with some rising to prominent positions in Australian society. Approximately 20% of modern Australians are descended from transported convicts. Once deemed the "convict stain", it is now considered by many Australians to be a cause for celebration to have a convict in one's lineage.
Although John was convicted in York on 18th October 1845, it was almost four years later before he was actually put on a Transportation Ship. It seems likely that he was held in the south of England for all this time in what was known as a ‘Hulk’, which was a decommissioned ship, no longer capable of going to sea. The Industrial Revolution had led to an increase in petty crime due to the economic displacement of much of the population, putting pressure on the government to find an alternative to confinement in overcrowded gaols, at one stage holding over 80% of criminals who had been convicted of theft. The overcrowding situation was so dire that hulks left over from the Seven Years’ War were used as makeshift floating prisons. This practice was gradually rescinded in the 1800’s because Judges and Juries considered its punishment too harsh, but since lawmakers still wanted punishment to deter potential criminals, they increasingly applied transportation as a more humane alternative to imprisonment or execution.
|A Hulk [Prison Ship] moored on the Thames|
John was one of 305 convicts who left their homeland, on 18th April 1849 on a ship called ‘Neptune’ for the perilous journey which took virtually 12 months to arrive in Hobart, Tasmania on 5th April 1850. By the time of arrival only 282 out of the 305 original convicts had survived the journey. A complete list of all the convicts on the ship can be viewed here, and it can be seen that they came from all walks of life and from all parts of the country, including many from Ireland.The reason the voyage took so long was that the Neptune was originally destined to transport the convicts to South Africa, where the authorities intended to establish a new penal colony, and on 19 September 1849 The Neptune entered and anchored in Simon's Bay (now Simonstown) in the Cape, after being met earlier with a furious city population in Table Bay. However, the residents of the Cape were also outraged at this proposal, and a resistance movement called the Anti-Convict Committee was established, and this resistance movement eventually succeeded, with the English Parliament cancelling this plan, leaving the Ship’s Captain with little alternative but to set sail again and make for Tasmania.
In the early days of transportation, conditions on board ship were terrible and many died on the journey, which normally took between four and six months. Towards the mid-19th century, things had improved and examination of the transportation records indicates that the number who perished on the voyage had reduced.
Many of the convicts in the early years of transportation were already disease ridden and many died from typhoid and cholera in the dreadful conditions on the ships. Those that survived were severely weakened by scurvy, dysentery and fever.
|Below deck during Transportation|
of transportationew SouthIn early transportation, convicts were taken aboard in chains and shackles. Once aboard these were unlocked. A hatch was opened and the convicts went below to the prison deck and the hatch was locked. Sometimes, however, they were kept in chains and behind bars even on board.
The convict quarters had ventilators to let in light and air. The port end would be reasonably light but the bows dark and gloomy. On some ships, in the early days, convicts were kept below most of the time. In many cases they were restrained in chains and were only allowed on deck for fresh air and exercise.
The cramped, unhygienic conditions on the early convict ships were very difficult. As the 19th century progressed, the conditions began to improve. By the 1840s, the routine was more enlightened. Surgeons were no longer in the pay of the ship's master and their sole responsibility was the well-being of the convicts. Daily life even included a Religious Instructor who could both educate the convicts and look after their spiritual needs. Importantly, a bonus was paid to the ship charterers for the safe landing of the prisoners.
The filthy conditions gave way to a more ordered layout, as described by John Acton Wroth, a literate young man who was transported in the 1840's. He describes an area with bunks along either side of the deck, each separated from its neighbour by a ten inch high board. Four berths of the lower and upper tiers formed a mess, constructed so that four men could sit round a table. Those men occupying mid ship slept in hammocks, slung up each night over the tables. Younger men had these. Each bed had a mattress, pillow and two blankets. The hammock had two blankets only.
Little is known about John Bancroft after he arrived in Tasmania, other than the fact that, along with virtually every other convict on the ship, he was given a ‘Conditional Pardon’, which may well have been due to the fact that he had spent his sentence largely in a Hulk Ship in England and then spend a further 12 months at sea in transit. A Conditional Pardon freed convicts, and was granted on the condition that the convict did not return to England or Ireland, meaning they could never return to their homeland. Many freed convicts often took off for the Victorian gold fields, as this was one of the few places in the colonies where an ex-convict could find work. It seems likely that he did not re-offend, as he does not show up on any further records after his arrival in 1850, although it is possible that John may have altered his name, so as not to appear on any records, as many convicts did, in order to try and make a new start in their new country.
There is also evidence of a different and unrelated 'John Bancroft', born in Manchester around 1840, who travelled legitimately from Liverpool to Melbourne in Australia, landing in February 1862, and then marrying an Elizabeth Griffin in 1866 at Sydney. He may also have been the same person who worked as a Commercial Traveller and died in a place called Woonana, New South Wales, although I have not been able to confirm all this.
Here is a register of Conditional Pardons from the time, together with a copy of a Conditional Pardon from New South Wales. Neither refer to John Bancroft unfortunately
|Conditional Pardon register|
|Conditional Pardon - New South Wales.|
And finally, here is an extract from the local newspaper, the Hobart Courier, commenting on the arrival of the Neptune and it's cargo of convicts, which does not show any real hostility to them, even holding out the hand of friendship to the new arrivals:
"....were the arrival of this vessel an incident by itself, we should say nothing against it. If the men on board that vessel have the slightest moral sense, they have bitterly felt the penalty of their crimes. Among them some may be found whose very offences are almost justified by their appearance on our shores. They were convicted of hostility to the English Government, but there is not a man in Van Diemen's Land with whom the magnitude of that offence is not lessened, when he finds that official truculence and perfidy are the deeds which make office sure. We do not counsel the smallest injury to the freight of the Neptune, they are men, not chests of tea, or we should appeal to the warm blood of the Mohawks, and to the example of Boston. We shall not forget that these men are our countrymen, that they are neither worse nor better than the twenty thousand prisoners within the last ten years poured on these shores, and that they are the bearers to this colony of a final justification of whatever attitude it may assume hereafter."